The consultation closed on 15th of June 2023. The FSA’s stance on MSM is a contentious issue, with some arguing that it poses a higher risk of foodborne illness due to its processing methods. Others believe that it is a safe and efficient way to produce meat products. The FSA has maintained its position that MSM is safe and has not changed its stance despite the criticism.

The FSA’s view is that the judgment does not require the industry to change its current practices. However, the industry has expressed concerns about the judgment’s potential impact on their business. **Key Points:**

* **Industry Disagreements:** There are disagreements among industry stakeholders regarding the interpretation and implications of the Supreme Court Judgment.

The criteria are based on a scientific approach, with the removal of meat from bone being just one component of the process. The FSA highlighted that MSM production is a complex process and that the judgment’s narrow focus on bone-separation as the sole criterion is not representative of the entire industry. The FSA stressed the importance of the scientific approach used in MSM production.

Consumers also expressed concerns about the use of artificial ingredients, particularly in processed foods. This was a growing trend, and consumers were increasingly wary of the hidden ingredients in their food. Finally, concerns were raised about the food industry’s sustainability practices. Consumers wanted to know how their food was produced and how it impacted the environment. **Detailed Analysis of Consumer Concerns**

Consumers emphasized the importance of clear and transparent labeling.

1. **The impact of the reclassification on businesses:** This section will delve into the specific challenges faced by different types of businesses, including food manufacturers, restaurants, and retailers. It will also examine the potential impact on employment and consumer spending. 2.